That wasn't his claim. His claim was that every culture has gender roles and that those roles are universally complementary to one another. Which is very clearly what Jordan believed. This doesn't seem particularly controversial.
So is just assuming that someone who uses "we" in that context is referring to literally all book readers. All it takes is a quick moment of reflection to realize that she clearly didn't claim to speak for every single book reader.
Indeed. So everyone just keeps coming back to beat the same dead horse.
That's just not true. There was plenty of disharmony and division following Sanderson's entry into the series.
You haven’t been here very long. Maybe go back and read some of my posts and then come back and tell me what I am deflecting.
I liked the show. Although it was very different from the books, I’m glad they made it. I wish they would have finished it.
I guess we will never know since it will never be finished. But I would have preferred to see what he had planned than to never have WoT on screen.
We’ll never get it now.
I’m not sure how one becomes a “defender of Rafe” for simply pointing out that there would never have been a show without him.
I guess the prevailing opinion is that having no adaptation of WoT is preferable to having Rafe’s admittedly imperfect effort. I do not share that opinion.