Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

[Advanced] Gods and Demons Mafia - All your souls belong to Shad (Triads win)


Clovdyx

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

and also

 

 


"Anyone else just hasn't really jumped out at me or anything. Maybe I made a read on a player I already forgot too, who knows. It doesn't matter because with every passing second my reads are liable to change

 

So I don't put them in a list, I don't categorize them and I let what is going to come come naturally."

 

Posted

In the presence of new or reexamined information you are allowed to change your mind on players.
 

If you want to say I'm scum because I changed my mind then all I'll do is laugh and point out the scums dumb enough to jump on my wagon

Posted

Eh, I'll try to ISO you once I finish the last few pages of catch-up. But that's a pretty simple statement you could make as scum to cover your butt in case of a contradiction.

Posted

Eh, I'll try to ISO you once I finish the last few pages of catch-up. But that's a pretty simple statement you could make as scum to cover your butt in case of a contradiction.

 

Then you don't know monstrman

Posted

Not to mention villagers and townies contradict themselves just as much and or more often than scums too so, that tell is rand also

 

Werewolf is a player-specific game when it comes to reads

Posted

In the presence of new or reexamined information you are allowed to change your mind on players.

 

If you want to say I'm scum because I changed my mind then all I'll do is laugh and point out the scums dumb enough to jump on my wagon

You are more than welcome to change your mind. When you don't state it in thread and then say "I would have lynched so and so" the next day, I have no reason to believe you. Does that make sense?

Posted

 

In the presence of new or reexamined information you are allowed to change your mind on players.

 

If you want to say I'm scum because I changed my mind then all I'll do is laugh and point out the scums dumb enough to jump on my wagon

You are more than welcome to change your mind. When you don't state it in thread and then say "I would have lynched so and so" the next day, I have no reason to believe you. Does that make sense?

 

 

I would have lynched a lot of people over the leading two wagons, you included.

 

That said I don't believe you're a wolf atm so

Posted

With the hours I'm working there's no way I have time to catch up on all this. 

 

In the meantime, anyone want to give me the sparknotes version of the past 600+ posts?

Posted

Not to mention villagers and townies contradict themselves just as much and or more often than scums too so, that tell is rand also

 

Werewolf is a player-specific game when it comes to reads

I don't assume that all contradictions/sudden read changes are scummy.  I look at the particular situation.

 

You're either town who called Laine town, changed your mind without telling us, called for a CFD on a group which included her without naming her, and then made the adjustment explicit the next day, or you are scum who didn't put much thought into my question and when I called you out on it pointed to a cya clause.

 

The former is possible.  I don't have a compelling reason to believe it is more likely.

Posted

 

 

In the presence of new or reexamined information you are allowed to change your mind on players.

 

If you want to say I'm scum because I changed my mind then all I'll do is laugh and point out the scums dumb enough to jump on my wagon

You are more than welcome to change your mind. When you don't state it in thread and then say "I would have lynched so and so" the next day, I have no reason to believe you. Does that make sense?

 

 

I would have lynched a lot of people over the leading two wagons, you included.

 

That said I don't believe you're a wolf atm so

 

 

But you did say you thought I had deep wolf equity.  That's why I only questioned you about Laine.

Posted

 

 

 

In the presence of new or reexamined information you are allowed to change your mind on players.

 

If you want to say I'm scum because I changed my mind then all I'll do is laugh and point out the scums dumb enough to jump on my wagon

You are more than welcome to change your mind. When you don't state it in thread and then say "I would have lynched so and so" the next day, I have no reason to believe you. Does that make sense?

 

 

I would have lynched a lot of people over the leading two wagons, you included.

 

That said I don't believe you're a wolf atm so

 

 

But you did say you thought I had deep wolf equity.  That's why I only questioned you about Laine.

 

 

Nah your responses are pretty good here. 

Posted

Mod post:

 

Celeste will be subbing in for John Snow.  Do not discuss subs.

 

Well, substitutions.  You guys can discuss sandwiches, I guess.

Posted

 

 

 

 

In the presence of new or reexamined information you are allowed to change your mind on players.

 

If you want to say I'm scum because I changed my mind then all I'll do is laugh and point out the scums dumb enough to jump on my wagon

You are more than welcome to change your mind. When you don't state it in thread and then say "I would have lynched so and so" the next day, I have no reason to believe you. Does that make sense?

 

 

I would have lynched a lot of people over the leading two wagons, you included.

 

That said I don't believe you're a wolf atm so

 

 

But you did say you thought I had deep wolf equity.  That's why I only questioned you about Laine.

 

 

Nah your responses are pretty good here. 

 

Re: I think I'm comfortable just clearing you

Posted

 

 

That said

 

Pocket attempt denied, Lenlo

 

[v]Lenlo[/v]

What?

 

I'm being spontaneous

 

Convince me it's a bad idea if you're town

 

Well, guess all I got is im not tryin to pocket you? Like I assume your good. People react to what you do with respect and wariness, which leads me to believe youve played for awhile. Voting me is also the first real push youve done today, so id say what I said about not doing any srs hunting was accurate. Even now its like your gauging me and dont actually believe in the lynch yet.

 

Turin Turambar 30 Nolder 27 John Snow 11 Pralaya 10 Thane Vakarian 4

 

 

Also this group has scums in it

 

Rule of atleast 1 wolf in the lowest posters?

Posted

 

 

 

That said

 

Pocket attempt denied, Lenlo

 

[v]Lenlo[/v]

What?

 

I'm being spontaneous

 

Convince me it's a bad idea if you're town

 

Well, guess all I got is im not tryin to pocket you? Like I assume your good. People react to what you do with respect and wariness, which leads me to believe youve played for awhile. Voting me is also the first real push youve done today, so id say what I said about not doing any srs hunting was accurate. Even now its like your gauging me and dont actually believe in the lynch yet.

 

Turin Turambar 30 Nolder 27 John Snow 11 Pralaya 10 Thane Vakarian 4

 

 

Also this group has scums in it

 

Rule of atleast 1 wolf in the lowest posters?

 

Siiiii

 

It's a valid rule in almost every game

Posted

With the hours I'm working there's no way I have time to catch up on all this. 

 

In the meantime, anyone want to give me the sparknotes version of the past 600+ posts?

 

Eldrick became a stump and a bunch of people woke up with new roles, debate on whether D0 actually had scum in it or not.  Zander is an Innocent Child.  Not sure what specifics you want beyond that.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...