Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

Age of Legends [standard] Mafia - Game Over


BFG

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

@Shad

 

I am calling you out for the timing because you're claiming Calder is misrepping you by stating the order of events wrong. He is, in fact, not doing that. Because your reaction to him saying he didn't believe you was you quivering in your boots response. You only later expanded to Clov... I don't really care if it was 1 minute later, 10 minutes or 5 hours. Fact of the matter is you did wave it off with a defensive response INITIALLY.

 

As for me, I prolly tend to put more weight on initial reactions because I think they're a lot more telling than ones where a player has time to think it over. Your initial response was a bad one. If you had an explanation for your comment and thinking he was new, then I would expect you to just spell it out. Instead you just spazzed. I didn't care for it. Your question later on about what scum would do was obtuse. Didn't really care for that either. I also think Calder responded well... so I don't really get how he's not answering you.

 

 

Look at this BS post.  You are lying.

  

 

 

 

 

Lol. Damn phone. Response went into the quote section. So repeated below (shortened):

My issue is that it has the feel of a post that doesnt need to be made. It is game related, but says nothing and means little. So why post it if ur town?

Its the scum "hey guys im active post."

 

Interesting.  Would you expect scum to post read-related fluff right off the bat?

Little early to break out the wine isnt it?

 

Hmm?

WIFOM. Its getting invoked seriously early here. Your question is a leading one. It says scum wouldnt do this obviously. But, then a good scum player would do exactly that to appear as town. So if your a reasonably good player the inherent behavior cannot really be judged either way.

Its the tone of the post that i took issue with after all though.

My answer to your pg 3 question again. I answered you. With some real assessment that u didnt appreciate.

  • Replies 2.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Supposing you are town, you are doing just what you're calling me out for.  Knee-jerk reaction.  I don't think #244 is scummy but the argument doesn't lead to scum tells.  When people get called out blatantly like that they get aggressive.

Posted

 

 

@Shad

 

I am calling you out for the timing because you're claiming Calder is misrepping you by stating the order of events wrong. He is, in fact, not doing that. Because your reaction to him saying he didn't believe you was you quivering in your boots response. You only later expanded to Clov... I don't really care if it was 1 minute later, 10 minutes or 5 hours. Fact of the matter is you did wave it off with a defensive response INITIALLY.

 

As for me, I prolly tend to put more weight on initial reactions because I think they're a lot more telling than ones where a player has time to think it over. Your initial response was a bad one. If you had an explanation for your comment and thinking he was new, then I would expect you to just spell it out. Instead you just spazzed. I didn't care for it. Your question later on about what scum would do was obtuse. Didn't really care for that either. I also think Calder responded well... so I don't really get how he's not answering you.

 

Look at this BS post.  You are lying.

  

 

 

 

 

Lol. Damn phone. Response went into the quote section. So repeated below (shortened):

My issue is that it has the feel of a post that doesnt need to be made. It is game related, but says nothing and means little. So why post it if ur town?

Its the scum "hey guys im active post."

 

Interesting.  Would you expect scum to post read-related fluff right off the bat?

Little early to break out the wine isnt it?

 

Hmm?

WIFOM. Its getting invoked seriously early here. Your question is a leading one. It says scum wouldnt do this obviously. But, then a good scum player would do exactly that to appear as town. So if your a reasonably good player the inherent behavior cannot really be judged either way.

Its the tone of the post that i took issue with after all though.

My answer to your pg 3 question again. I answered you. With some real assessment that u didnt appreciate.

 

 

Where?

Posted

I could get behind what Calder is selling if he would just spell you're correctly.

 

That said, interesting non-reactions to my Thane vote. Nobody has a comment on that?

Posted

Supposing you are town, you are doing just what you're calling me out for.  Knee-jerk reaction.  I don't think #244 is scummy but the argument doesn't lead to scum tells.  When people get called out blatantly like that they get aggressive.

 

What was blatant about it?  He just said he didn't believe you. So what?

Posted

I could get behind what Calder is selling if he would just spell you're correctly.

 

That said, interesting non-reactions to my Thane vote. Nobody has a comment on that?

 

I choose to tune you out, personally.  

Posted

Shad i am getting a headache from this. Its prob my own failing. My answer was and remains that your question was not indicative of either town or scum alignment, and, therefore, i could give no other assessment.

Posted

 

Supposing you are town, you are doing just what you're calling me out for.  Knee-jerk reaction.  I don't think #244 is scummy but the argument doesn't lead to scum tells.  When people get called out blatantly like that they get aggressive.

 

What was blatant about it?  He just said he didn't believe you. So what?

 

 

"I don't believe you" and "I think you're lying" mean the same thing.  >_>

Posted

I could get behind what Calder is selling if he would just spell you're correctly.

That said, interesting non-reactions to my Thane vote. Nobody has a comment on that?

Do most of my posting from my phone, so grammer shortcuts are often taken.

Posted

 

 

Supposing you are town, you are doing just what you're calling me out for.  Knee-jerk reaction.  I don't think #244 is scummy but the argument doesn't lead to scum tells.  When people get called out blatantly like that they get aggressive.

 

What was blatant about it?  He just said he didn't believe you. So what?

 

 

"I don't believe you" and "I think you're lying" mean the same thing.  >_>

 

 

So? One player doesn't believe you....... I legit can't believe we're having this conversation.... lol

Posted

 

 

Supposing you are town, you are doing just what you're calling me out for.  Knee-jerk reaction.  I don't think #244 is scummy but the argument doesn't lead to scum tells.  When people get called out blatantly like that they get aggressive.

 

 

What was blatant about it?  He just said he didn't believe you. So what?

 

"I don't believe you" and "I think you're lying" mean the same thing.  >_>

Yep they do. My choice of wording was just more polite, bc i am a gentleman. Don't see why this bothers you so much. We are trying to findliars are we not?

Posted

 

 

And it's odd that you single this out considering I did directly engage you in another post.  (You initially blew it off with the WIFOM comment.)  I'm getting a Kivam in Pulp Fiction vibe.  >_>

 

I'm getting a BS vibe.

 

The reason that is being pointed out is because you reacted badly. You commented about him not being new. When he said he didn't believe you, Instead of explaining yourself, you waved it off by slipping into defensive mode with the quivering in your boots bit. It's swell that you explained later on... but your initial reaction was no bueno. So yes, it's gonna be pointed out.

 

 

Did it really happen that way?  Calder called me a liar and Clov asked for elaboration.  I rolled my eyes at Calder, explained myself to Clov, then went back to address Calder further.  "Avoiding explanation" was Calder's spin on the event.  Both posts were already on the table.  There was no "later on".

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oh hey this isn't actually your first mafia game.

Nonchalant response attempt noted, but not believed.

 

Gonna leave this here so people can see Shad's exaggeration of events. I did not call him a liar. I called out his actions as having a fake vibe that points towards scum alignment. A reasonable accusation, not a flat out your 100% scum call-out. He then proceeded to oddly play it off badly.

 

Fixed your quote to the one we're actually discussing. Explain to me how you are not calling me a liar here.

 

My mistake for thinking you would want to start our analysis of events from the beginning. But, yea i basically called you a liar in that post.if you take offense to that then your in the wrong game. It was my second response to you (first i already quoted above) and it was to put you on your back foot and get a response. I was open on my stance until you tried to play it off again. Then it became my stance for real. Your scum.

 

 

If I refer to the post where you called me a liar and you quote a different post and say look guys, Shad is lying, I didn't call him a liar, you can't just back off and say 'well excuse me for wanting to start from the beginning'.  You are spinning the conversation again.

 

I don't believe i am spinning anything. I believed your point was that i called you a liar immediately. I misread you, but tbh i dont feel bad bc your kind of all over the place. You keep bringing up this timeline issue when everything you quote proves my side of events. If nyn wasnt nailing home this exact point then i might have gone insane. I have zero clue what your line of reasoning is here.

 

What is difficult about my line of reasoning?  I said you called me a liar.  You quoted a post where you didn't and said "nope" instead of quoting the post where you did.  Why should i not be suspicious of this?

Posted

 

 

 

Supposing you are town, you are doing just what you're calling me out for.  Knee-jerk reaction.  I don't think #244 is scummy but the argument doesn't lead to scum tells.  When people get called out blatantly like that they get aggressive.

 

What was blatant about it?  He just said he didn't believe you. So what?

 

"I don't believe you" and "I think you're lying" mean the same thing.  >_>

Yep they do. My choice of wording was just more polite, bc i am a gentleman. Don't see why this bothers you so much. We are trying to findliars are we not?

 

 

How is this remotely relevant to Nyn's question?  She asked me what was blatant about "I don't believe you".

Posted

Bc i already admitted once you clarified that i subsequently had. It was confusion over the post which was quickly clarified.

 

Try a different line of argument. This one is leading to the gallows for you.

Posted

Calder not believing Shad's nonchalant act on page 3 = blatantly calling Shad out...... okay.

 

I mean if you can't admit that your reaction was completely disproportional to the prod... then I don't know what to tell you.

Posted

 

 

 

Supposing you are town, you are doing just what you're calling me out for.  Knee-jerk reaction.  I don't think #244 is scummy but the argument doesn't lead to scum tells.  When people get called out blatantly like that they get aggressive.

 

What was blatant about it?  He just said he didn't believe you. So what?

 

 

"I don't believe you" and "I think you're lying" mean the same thing.  >_>

 

 

So? One player doesn't believe you....... I legit can't believe we're having this conversation.... lol

 

 

You asked what was blatant about it.  I explained.  The fact that one player doesn't believe me is totally besides the point here.  Calder called me a liar and I made a knee-jerk reaction.  You took that to be scummy.  So I called you a liar and you made a knee-jerk reaction.  It's a natural thing to do regardless of alignment.  This is my point.

Posted

Here's the difference. Your knee jerk reaction does not make sense because it was an overreaction over basically nothing. Where's I haven't liked much of your content and said as much since I caught up.... you putting a stop to our exchange by basically calling my post BS.....  means we have nothing further to discuss.

 

This is my point.

Posted

I think what bugs me most right now is that you're not owning up to what you're doing. If you've been transparent about the whole thing and went like... my bad.... I did overreact... or, my bad... the sequence of events is not how I thought...... but you keep digging and you're reaching. This new 'He called me a liar, boo hoo'.... is particularly mind numbing.

Posted

I also laughed when you asked me if I was seriously making a ten minutes distinctions between posts. It's an amusing question because you went off using timing to build a case on Calder... but when I use the actual timing to show that you're wrong.... you get all 'Seriously??'  

Posted

What is difficult about my line of reasoning?  I said you called me a liar.  You quoted a post where you didn't and said "nope" instead of quoting the post where you did.  Why should i not be suspicious of this?

Bc i already admitted once you clarified that i subsequently had. It was confusion over the post which was quickly clarified.

 

Try a different line of argument. This one is leading to the gallows for you.

You admitted that there was confusion on your part, and that's fine. What is your point in bringing that up now?  You concluded the previous post by saying my line of reasoning makes no sense, so I explained my line of reasoning.  I had to have thought it before your explanation.  So whether I believe your explanation or not is irrelevant here.

 

It goes like this:  I ask x.  You explain and go "I'm not sure why you were thinking that."  I explain "this is why I was thinking x".  You come back with "You need to stop pushing x or you're going to get lynched, buddy."  This is scummy play.

Posted

I also laughed when you asked me if I was seriously making a ten minutes distinctions between posts. It's an amusing question because you went off using timing to build a case on Calder... but when I use the actual timing to show that you're wrong.... you get all 'Seriously??'  

 

He referred to posts out of sequence.  You referred to the RL time taken to make them.  How are these the same?

Posted

 

I also laughed when you asked me if I was seriously making a ten minutes distinctions between posts. It's an amusing question because you went off using timing to build a case on Calder... but when I use the actual timing to show that you're wrong.... you get all 'Seriously??'  

 

He referred to posts out of sequence.  You referred to the RL time taken to make them.  How are these the same?

 

 

I don't even know what you're talking about at this point.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...