Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

(ADVANCED) Naruto Mafia GAME OVER!


amegakure

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 815
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

His defense is "your case doesn't have logic!" and "you are the scum MVP!"

 

Pretty much no defense at all. He just keeps saying it repeatedly to see if it'll stick. Meh.

 

There is no viable reason not to lynch this shady creep.

Posted

He likes pointing out your logical fallacies to make his own seem more valid, it seems.

 

The only thing that I don't get is why he would even claim roleblocker in the first place... ? I mean, just to outright claim it and then flub up in his defense like this. I just don't see the strategy here.

Posted

Yeah god forbid we should build cases on logic.

 

Btw, even ignoring that it begs the question, Ape's case on me makes very little sense if Meesh is the real doc. Ishy didn't out until today. If Meesh were the real doc and I were scum hell bent on killing the doc, why wouldn't I roleblock/kill her last night instead of having a teammate counterclaim her and then trying to get one of them lynched?

Posted

He likes pointing out your logical fallacies to make his own seem more valid, it seems.

 

The only thing that I don't get is why he would even claim roleblocker in the first place... ? I mean, just to outright claim it and then flub up in his defense like this. I just don't see the strategy here.

 

I claimed roleblocker because I'm a town roleblocker and I thought I had proof that Hoof and Ishy were lying. Amega has since clarified some things and I don't have proof anymore. Hoof is still extremely suspect though. I would like Hoof to confirm exactly what he saw N1.

 

Also, what happened to that duel thing?

Posted

Yeah god forbid we should build cases on logic.

 

Btw, even ignoring that it begs the question, Ape's case on me makes very little sense if Meesh is the real doc. Ishy didn't out until today. If Meesh were the real doc and I were scum hell bent on killing the doc, why wouldn't I roleblock/kill her last night instead of having a teammate counterclaim her and then trying to get one of them lynched?

 

Which, for the hundredth time, is why I suspect you as the silent killer. You keep ignoring the blatant point that I've accused you of pushing a 3rd party agenda, and you continually defend as though I'm accusing you of being scum.

 

I hope other people see what your doing here. I think its pretty transparent.

Posted

@ levity i did not see your vote. please repost it.

 

WILL UPDATE VOTE COUNT IN A MOMENT.

 

NARUTO DUEL:

 

CASE 1:

 

"This player's earlier posts were not only chock-full of encouraged meta, but they have also been rather short and sporadic. This player hasn't contributed as much as others as been contributing, and their arguments haven't lasted as long, either. The claim was shaky at best, and it possibly outed the town doctor (intentional or unintentional, what's done is done). A few of this player's earlier posts also suggested they may have known more about the mafia's motives than we realize, and they have been lying under the radar most of the time. Normally, around 85% of players that I've known to do this end up being anti-town roles (the other 15% of it being just a normal part of the player's style). Another thing is that this player may very well be a souped-up anti-town role with the ability they prematurely claimed, as it is not far-fetched at all in a game of this caliber and size.This player also possibly scumslipped on D2, something I already implied before but I've decided to be more specific about; votes made have also been with either little or no explanation attached to them."

CASE 2:

"This person must die. They have contributed very little to this game, using a method i call "active lurking". They have popped up occasionally, but not really saying anything important, just commenting on the game. This gives them the appearance of being active while really just skating through. This is a clear scumtell, and even if this person isn't scum- they are not really useful or important to have around. Secondly, they have openly supported Wombat, who has demonstrated nothing if not an utterly scummy and anti-town opinion. Anyone who would even try to support someone who has admitted to blocking two town power roles and tried to get another lynched is not playing a town game in my book."

YOU MAY VOTE ON THESE UNTIL DAYBREAK: NEED MAJORITY!

Posted

Ape's case on me makes very little sense if Meesh is the real doc.

 

Which is why, guess what?? It makes perfect sense because she in fact, isn't, the real doc.

 

Thanks. I wasn't sure where you stood on that one.

 

Yeah god forbid we should build cases on logic.

 

Btw, even ignoring that it begs the question, Ape's case on me makes very little sense if Meesh is the real doc. Ishy didn't out until today. If Meesh were the real doc and I were scum hell bent on killing the doc, why wouldn't I roleblock/kill her last night instead of having a teammate counterclaim her and then trying to get one of them lynched?

 

Which, for the hundredth time, is why I suspect you as the silent killer. You keep ignoring the blatant point that I've accused you of pushing a 3rd party agenda, and you continually defend as though I'm accusing you of being scum.

 

I hope other people see what your doing here. I think its pretty transparent.

 

I've never seen that role. Makes more sense to me to give an SK an unblockable kill rather than a roleblock to me anyways.

 

If I were an SK and roleblocker, why would I show my ass to lynch a doc claim when I could just wait another night? I was under no pressure until you started throwing poop at me.

Posted

Ape's case on me makes very little sense if Meesh is the real doc.

 

Which is why, guess what?? It makes perfect sense because she in fact, isn't, the real doc.

 

I lean towards believing you... but this defense from Wombat isn't even relevant. I'm saying he is 3rd party. He's defending like I'm saying he scum.

 

He's spending more time digging up goofy expressions on wiki, than he is actually processing what I'm saying. You know what I think when someone doesn't actually defend what they are being accused of, and instead just props up claims of "no logic" and OMGUS? I think they are guilty.

Posted

@ levity i did not see your vote. please repost it.

It's because I haven't voted yet.

 

How far away is Wombat from hammer? u.u I'll vote him after I know this information.

Posted

 

 

I've never seen that role. Makes more sense to me to give an SK an unblockable kill rather than a roleblock to me anyways.

 

If I were an SK and roleblocker, why would I show my ass to lynch a doc claim when I could just wait another night? I was under no pressure until you started throwing poop at me.

 

If you target one person with both the kill and the roleblock... it is an unblockable kill.

 

This is getting pathetic.

Posted

 

 

I've never seen that role. Makes more sense to me to give an SK an unblockable kill rather than a roleblock to me anyways.

 

If I were an SK and roleblocker, why would I show my ass to lynch a doc claim when I could just wait another night? I was under no pressure until you started throwing poop at me.

 

If you target one person with both the kill and the roleblock... it is an unblockable kill.

 

This is getting pathetic.

 

That's why it makes more sense to give an unblockable kill. It's less powerful because you can't separate the kill and the roleblock.

Posted

That's why it makes more sense to give an unblockable kill. It's less powerful because you can't separate the kill and the roleblock.

...

oh cripes.

Vote: Wombat

Posted

I'm gonna vote for Case #1

 

And I think Amega meant me, Levity.

 

Vote Ishy since you didn't see it last time, Amega.

Posted

 

 

I've never seen that role. Makes more sense to me to give an SK an unblockable kill rather than a roleblock to me anyways.

 

If I were an SK and roleblocker, why would I show my ass to lynch a doc claim when I could just wait another night? I was under no pressure until you started throwing poop at me.

 

If you target one person with both the kill and the roleblock... it is an unblockable kill.

 

This is getting pathetic.

 

That's why it makes more sense to give an unblockable kill. It's less powerful because you can't separate the kill and the roleblock.

 

The last time I was a silent killer I had a 1-time vest, 1-time inspection proof, and could kill in the day or night. You are splitting hairs, but not making a point. Again.

Posted

That's why it makes more sense to give an unblockable kill. It's less powerful because you can't separate the kill and the roleblock.

...

oh cripes.

Vote: Wombat

First of all...I don't get it, Levity. Like, honestly, I don't see what about that post is so awful.... XD

 

Secondly, maybe I should stop using color codes in mafia games. XD

 

Vote Ishy

Posted

Most Valuable Primate

 

This is scum's favorite way to make me second guess myself.

 

It's also town's favorite way to razz you when you're wrong.

Posted

Well I was kind of starting to maybe believe wombat, if he was a scum roleblocker then meesh would be dead... you can't really be a roleblocker and an sk, so I never thought he was 3rd party... but he was hammered. Hopefully it was a good thing.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...