Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

[T+M Mafia] Chains of Blood: Crimson Tides - GAME OVER


Toy and Minion

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 676
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

So the deathseekers and the asteri pack are pretty much the same thing, one is just guilty and one is just innocent I think.

 

Assassins are what? Solos?

 

Adventures are Masons? Vanillas?

 

Here is what we have listed here:

Deathseekers - innocent?

Assassins

Adventurers

Asteri Pack - Guilty?

Cidwyr Collective dead

Posted

I have neither a stone nor a master. Why do you think it is me? I will tell you right now I am a Deathseeker. That is how I knew you targeted me on Night 1. I intentionally drew fire so Red could track me and see who came to visit. You were the only one. As I did not die, we presumed you innocent. Now tell me why you believe I have the Stone of Lies.

Posted

I targeted you both of the first two nights, Aemon. I thought after the first scene that I had been waylaid on my way towards you. Once I targeted you night two and still showed up visiting the man with the Stone of Lies, I concluded that I had not been waylaid and that you had the stone. I was unable to target anyone night three as I was blinded.

  • Moderator
Posted

I have neither a stone nor a master. Why do you think it is me? I will tell you right now I am a Deathseeker. That is how I knew you targeted me on Night 1. I intentionally drew fire so Red could track me and see who came to visit. You were the only one. As I did not die, we presumed you innocent. Now tell me why you believe I have the Stone of Lies.

 

 

I targeted you both of the first two nights, Aemon. I thought after the first scene that I had been waylaid on my way towards you. Once I targeted you night two and still showed up visiting the man with the Stone of Lies, I concluded that I had not been waylaid and that you had the stone. I was unable to target anyone night three as I was blinded.

 

 

Wombat, this makes you a thief. And probably scum.

 

Vote: Wombat

Posted

I honestly don't know what to think about you, Wombat. I have to admit that your Miller claim raised my hackles early in the game and I still more than half expect it to just be a nifty way to avoid being viewed. To be honest, the only reason i had not voted for you is that it would look more like an OMGUS than an actual reason for voting as I had nothing else on you. Your push on me, however, reeks of scum trying to take out the deathseekers. Why is that? Do you know what my ability is? Is that why you are afraid of me? Did I actually get protection the night you targeted me and that's why your trying for the lynch now?

 

UNVOTE

 

VOTE WOMBAT

Posted

I Kind of want to hear from Aemon more since Wombat is claiming the actions that Aemon did, do seem to indicate something bad.

 

Although it doesn't seem as though any deathseekers are reacting over this claim of Aemons, but then again we don't know if they are mafia or not.

 

 

 

It's possible that Wombat is scum as well, but if he is, he is pretty damn reckless.

 

And before we jump on the scum .vs not scum boat, I am going to take a step back because honestly I am "Cult" yet Innocent.

Posted

Womby, does your thief role have anything to do with the story? That makes me trust you less and less, actually.

 

And I think it's pretty safe to assume that the Deathseekers are innocent, Limi, unless you know something different? Your comment irked me a little bit-- how could they be "mafia" if they're the ones that have been getting killed mostly this game? Are you trying to plant an idea with that line of thought?

 

I'm also getting frustrated by the innocent/guilty talk. What I'm thinking is that innocent/guilty/neutral has to do mainly with the storyline and what happens to Dallar... which doesn't fare well for us either. And then we have the scum team(s) who are killing people (I would guess these to be the Asteri Pack and/or the Assassins, obviously). But maybe I'm thinking too hard about it.

Posted

The reason I have been thinking about them is because if you HAVE been reading the story it says that the two packs where the same thing. One had fewer members.

 

The Asteri show as Red color, meaning guilty, and the Deathseekers as blue meaning innocent.

 

I think it's possible for them to both be mafia personally. Or one is Mafia and the other Masons.

 

I personally don't have a win condition, so I really wonder how this game will know we reached an "ending".

 

I think the "normal" and the "black and white roles" won't get us far in this game and that what we expect aren't what we should base our things off of.

Posted

The reason I have been thinking about them is because if you HAVE been reading the story it says that the two packs where the same thing. One had fewer members.

 

The Asteri show as Red color, meaning guilty, and the Deathseekers as blue meaning innocent.

 

I think it's possible for them to both be mafia personally. Or one is Mafia and the other Masons.

 

I personally don't have a win condition, so I really wonder how this game will know we reached an "ending".

 

I think the "normal" and the "black and white roles" won't get us far in this game and that what we expect aren't what we should base our things off of.

Was the first line a dig at me? Thanks, but I have been reading.

 

I'm leaning mafia/masons, actually, especially with them having different colors and the deathseekers being such a big point in the story so far.

 

I think the win condition has something to do with Dallar, because I don't have one either.

 

Also, I couldn't agree with the last line more, finally someone acknowledges it besides me.

 

 

Posted

I know you say you agree with me, but honestly you seem to be stuck in that rut more than any one else posting.

 

Both by saying that I "must be or most likey am" anti town because I have the cult title despite the innocent part, and by saying roles that are typically seen as scum ping you, I kinda feel like you aren't willing to think outside the box.

 

It also seems a little odd that you aren't questions Aemon as well as Wombat.

Posted

I know you say you agree with me, but honestly you seem to be stuck in that rut more than any one else posting.

 

Both by saying that I "must be or most likey am" anti town because I have the cult title despite the innocent part, and by saying roles that are typically seen as scum ping you, I kinda feel like you aren't willing to think outside the box.

 

It also seems a little odd that you aren't questions Aemon as well as Wombat.

I'm not stuck in any rut Limi, I've actually been leaning more town on you. But Wombat has been pinging me with his miller claim since day one as well, and then pushing at Aemon without actually telling us much for the past few days? It feels like he doesn't really know much as he think he does. THAT coupled with claiming a thief role (if YOU were actually reading, you would realize that this role seems ever so faintly scummy), it makes me suspicious of him, and more likely to believe Aemon, who has been a lot more straight-foward about any claim HE has. And, since Womby is the one accusing Aemon, I'm logically going to question where the FoSing is coming from first.

 

So, why are you defending the thief?

Posted

I am not defending him, I don't think he couldn't be scum. You merely didn't comment at ALL on Aemon, and seemed to merely accept his reveal as it was, no questions asked, not explinations as to why you thought he was innocent. With the way you have asked all others about what they have said, you seemed to take it all rather easily.

 

I don't think it's defending some one to question some one completely unrelated to either of them.

 

I have yet to hear from Aemon or Wombat. They BOTH obviously are telling different things, I didn't say that being a thief wasn't bad either.

Posted

I am not defending him, I don't think he couldn't be scum. You merely didn't comment at ALL on Aemon, and seemed to merely accept his reveal as it was, no questions asked, not explinations as to why you thought he was innocent. With the way you have asked all others about what they have said, you seemed to take it all rather easily.

 

I don't think it's defending some one to question some one completely unrelated to either of them.

 

I have yet to hear from Aemon or Wombat. They BOTH obviously are telling different things, I didn't say that being a thief wasn't bad either.

I didn't find it necessary to comment on anything Aemon said because it wasn't all that interesting; obviously Red can't confirm his actions (because she is dead) and if Aemon is a deathseeker, he probably is one because nobody has called him out for NOT being one of them. As for his claims, I believe him because I'm inclined NOT to believe Wombat at this point because of his actions. So now I've stated the obvious, you really shouldn't have needed me to do so unless you know that Aemon isn't a deathseeker and you're pushing for that to come out without making yourself a target.

 

I would love to hear more from Aemon and wombat too at this point, mainly to decide if it's better to vote Womby or not.

Posted

Holy cow I missed a lot. Wonder what the penalty for not getting the Lynch will be.

 

Wombat and Aemon's exchange the past while had my nickers in a twist from the beginning. So Wombat claims a thief, Aemon claims Deathseeker. Both go unchallegenged. Who am I to believe? Both? Niether? I haven't decided yet. But I would like to see an actual lynch happen this time. I'm going to read some of the scenes again and see if I can see where this is all coming from.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...