Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

Myrddraal and a balance for the light


KingK

Recommended Posts

Hello again!

 

As Min had said, in one fashion or another "point to to the bad, and there is good." 

 

The Wheel if time is all about Balance as we all know.

 

For every good there is an evil, but the truth applies the other way.

 

Myrddraal were created to fight for the Shadow. A being of Maggot white skin, that somehow dissappear in the Shadow.

 

But what other characteristics are there of Myrddraal that make them stand out?

 

Well, the wind does not touch them for one, cloaks remain still in a breeze. The are often seen riding a horse weilding a wicked black sword.  

 

Their eyes are missing only showing their mouth. The look of the eyeless is... (well was it death or fear? I forget the quote) Taller than most.

 

I think that is a rough sum of a Myrddraal.  If anyone has any guesses yet of the lights Balance of such a creation, now is your chance to think to yourself and come up with the answer? 

 

Ready?

 

Here goes.

 

Who rides no horse? Who vanishes in the daylight? Dark, sun-kissed skin? Never known to ride a horse?

Won't touch a sword? Covers everything other then their eyes when they kill?  Who does not fear death?

 

Almost point for point the Aiel counter the Myrddraal. 

The one point above all that made me come to this conclusion was the fact that a Myrddraal cloak was never touched or stirred from the wind.

 

What an odd detail? Yet so strongly enforced. But what is the balance? The wind? ..... the wind?? What could be the opposite of a Mrydrall?

 

Then is dawned on me.

 

The way of the Leaf

 

The leaf lives its appointed time, and does not struggle against the wind that carries it away. 🍃 

 

Bonus: Feel free to add your own balances to the list. Nakomi to Shaidar Haran for instance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Myrddraal are beings created by Aginor explicitly as living weapons, though, they are definitionally Shadowspawn and physically cannot make independent moral judgements. They are creatures of the Dark One/The Shadow fully and completely.

 

The Aiel are humans. They follow a particular code, but there are very clearly Aiel in the series working to advance the Light or to advance their own petty concerns (Sevannah and the Shaido more broadly). Aiel end up fighting for the Shadow; turned against their will, sure, but also you can't exactly "turn" a Myrddraal to the light. The point is that humans have the power of choice.

 

To other points, both Sharans and Sea Folk are specifically mentioned to have much darker skin tones than the Aiel. Aiel can hide really well in the daytime, but uh, they do hide better at night. Also, they cannot slide sideways into daylight to disappear or phase through walls.

 

I feel like this reading is really missing the forest for the trees (or should I say missing the tree for the leaves?)

 

To me, the characters most in opposition to Fades are Warders. Apart from named characters with plot armor who start to knock them down like bowling pins in books 4+5, Warders are the only humans with a reasonable 1-on-1 chance against a Fade (Aiel still need to gang up on them and are going to take heavy casualties). They also have weird cloaks. They're real good with swords. They are also "created" using the power, by supporters of the Light, and almost certainly with fighting Fades in mind, and this process robs them of some degree of free will through the bond.

 

If anything, I don't think there is supposed to be a "direct opposite" to Fades other than people in general. They are inhuman monsters who physically resemble us but are different in the most important aspects that I listed above: they are "soulless" both in name and in truth, and they cannot choose how to behave morally. They are fundamental perversions of humanity. They are a representation the Dark One's solution for the messiness of the world; to strip everything of the choice between Light or Dark, and force them to the Dark path (and it is the inverse destruction of free will that Rand rejects in the conclusion).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...