Lol, I had just discovered that.

Dude, I have been a professional linguist and text definitely has tone. But even if that is the wrong term I don't see how it could be misinterpreted. This is why I'm getting frantic vibes off you, but I don't know what that means.

Sounds right for the vig, and the watcher cannot peek at people's alignment, but can keep an eye on someone and will see who kills them if they are. I guess that is where the vig comes in, thw watcher won't know if it is mafia or vigilante who did the killing, though they will see the flip I suppose.

Captain, the cuteness sensors are overloading! The ship cannot take it! Switch to emergency power, and redirect the lateral shields! We cannot let this sneaky wolf attack overwhelm us! She's gonnae blow, Cap'n! ABANDON SHIP! ABANDON SHIP!

A mama wolf is still wolf, Gud 😄

Cannot say I disagree with any of Turin's reasoning atp, except maybe Cairos. I don't think joke references this early are indicative of alignment. At least not red flags. Though definitely agree he is a player we need to hear more from.

But Z, none of that would entail that you need to have a 6 page rant about the post. By all means be suspicious of Lenlo, vote for him, remind people of his behaviour. But you don't need to keep going on about it. But anyway, I think I've said that enough as well. I get the feeling the wolves are being quiet. Odds are heavily in their favour D1 it seems to me as long as they do nothing ridiculously suspicious. But stuff will start to polarize at EoD, which is quite some time away.

Fixed that for myself. It would be a bonus if people highlighted the correction though, especially in a long post.

Z, You fought people off with reason? Dude, you were wolfy af and everyone just said that just Zander. I did not see a whole lot of reasoning going. You seem a little frantic, but I'm not willing to say at this point that you are any more wolfy than you always appear to be. But I'm certainly not keen on how of the discussion is purely based on Zander/Lenlo arguing about jokes. I know this doesn't mean they are wolves or one of them, but it certain seems to be helping the wolves.

Surely all this focus on overreaction is a bit unnecessary? Isn't a wolf unlikely to massively overreact in any given situation, and villagers more likely to do so because of all the stress and uncertainty? Definitely arguing the point further isn't helpful to anyone. You both thought that each other overreacted to your reaction. I'd leave it at that, I think everyone has noted your exchange. If either/both of are town, think about what a wolf would want - a wolf would be deliberately causing the argument for wolfish reasons. A town would just be interested in making sure the wolfy behaviour was noticed. So I'd recommend letting it rest and finding the next bone of contention.

Always believe in you, Bro. So are you indulging in Turin's w/W action to muddy the waters, or are just arguing with a townie again. That's the tricky thing that there is nothing that only wolves would do or villagers. This sounds a lot like your argument with Turin last game about your lock clear meme. And you didn't stop arguing ril the game was over. But is this cover or honest... Really not sure. Would prefer to see the reads of people that know you two better.

GL, Cass. Rational!Heavy sends his regards 🙂

Crowd

Light, I think I need my eyes tested. Derails, not details. Ah it was autocorrect, it did it again.

Thank you. It is appreciated. Though I actually mean the game side of it. We need to be suspicious of people, but that is tricky if it completely details any Town player. I suppose it is easier to deal with with experience.

See? That is exactly what I'm talking about. I'm too suspicious of people that cast suspicion, and I'm way too suspicious of those that cast suspicion on me. Not helped by last game, though it wasn't actually wolves attacking me, it was their gameplan to encourage it and profit off it.

Have to say I feel Verb's take on Lenlo, except it is the same thing, giving opinions on early game posts as if they mean something. And a vote seems excessive, it is jot like we are talking about Zander. But Verb simply setting his stall out early or a little too confident in calling out someone's opinion? Stay tuned to find out in our next thrilling episode of Among Us Mafia Edition. Don't you dare touch that dial!

I typed "do Gudrean" instead of "so Gudrean". Didn't mean any lack respect, lol. I blame autocorrect.

*so Gudrean... That typo reads kinda odd.

Do Gudrean is being super nice as usual and thinks everyone is town? I guess we'll have to wait until she has some suspicions to get a good read. I was just going to copy whatever Dice did and hope he is still town. No one seems uber-wolfy, though cannot shake that negative feeling when someone points the finger at me. I guess I'll have to try and use others reads on those that call me sus.

I... Don't know how to take this. Somehow feels more personal than a game of mafia. Free psychoanalysis.

That is just because I am so cute. Though new to DM, I'm part of the OG WoT fanbase, got EotW from the library when it came out when I was in my early teens.

Definitely my headcanon image of Zander.

Phew, that was my number one fear. I'm just a simple gal at heart. People who have a good sense of humour, are kind to animals, aren't Shadowspawn and randed Town are some of my top turn ons.

Of course I want to be friends, I'm just not entirely sure how that would be interpreted in a game of Mafia. Plus no one has asked me that in at least 40 years so the question threw me slightly.