Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

Andrej

Member
  • Posts

    21481
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Andrej

  1. 13 minutes ago, Nolder said:

    Yeah I've always felt alchemy as a class in itself was under utilized by most players.

    and I didn't remember that I thought vamp and werewolf were both DLC.

     

    Ive tinkered with some stealth cloak-n-dagger builds where I utilized the poison tree but never fleshed it out fully. It’s really an easy and viable way to buff/level and earn some coin at the same time.

     

    Dawnguard brought the vampire questline, but I’m pretty sure you can still contract vampirism without it. You just don’t get the separate skill trees. I never dabbled too much in it tbh.

  2. 26 minutes ago, Nolder said:

    It's been a long time so I can't really remember...was it Oblivion or Skyrim which had a pretty good alchemy systm? If Skyrim I say be a potions master for all your needs. If not then be a werewolf/vampire ASAP. If you don't have the DLC and alchemy sucks then try playing a wizard dagger/staff hybrid where the only magic you're allowed to use comes from staves, otherwise you can use the dagger for physical attacks.I

     

    If none of that sounds appealing then use SDs random thing I guess.

     

    Alchemy is pretty good in Skyrim. I’ve never dabbled too much in it, but now thinking about it that would give me plenty of grinding skills to use lol. The house in Whiterun comes with its own chest and alchemy table. Maybe I’ll go Breaking Bad and become a skooma dealer ?‍?

     

    I dont have the DLCs anymore but you can still become a werewolf through the Companions storyline.

  3. 14 hours ago, Zanatron said:

    Fair enough

     

    In any football discussion you’re supposed to call me an idiot for being wrong. this isn’t Mafia 

     

    its sorta jacked the Chargers are tied for first record wise but since they share a division with the Chiefs they are a #5 seed

  4. On 1/2/2019 at 6:53 AM, Zanatron said:

    Seattle

    Chicago

     

    UPSET PICK RAVENS!!!!

    Indy

     

    Not really sure you could call the Ravens an upset pick atp. They’re playing at home and on a winning streak, plus they already beat the Chargers a few weeks ago.

  5. On 1/1/2019 at 10:01 PM, Krakalakachkn said:

    Probably the game I'm looking forward to the most.  I enjoy watching Prescott and Russell Wilson is so dangerous.

     

    Yeah I think it’ll be the best game this weekend.

  6. Chargers seem to be better on the road for some reason, and they’re supposed to be getting some guys back from injury so I don’t think that game will look the same as it did two weeks ago.

     

    Seattle is dangerous.

     

    Colts v Texans is a toss up imo.

     

    Chicago’s offense needs to generate against a banged up Philly secondary.

  7. 3 hours ago, Clovdyx said:

    The two that won.

     

    I don't know what Clemson can do to beat Bama if Tua plays the way he did.  I mean, realistically, is Clemson's offense going to be better than Oklahoma's?  Not likely.

     

    They might not need to be since their defense is on par with Bama.

  8. Playoffs more or less locked up.

     

    AFC

    1. Chiefs

    2. Patriots

    3. Texans

    4. Ravens

    5. Chargers

    6. Colts/Titans/Steelers

     

    NFC

    1. Saints

    2. Rams

    3. Bears

    4. Cowboys

    5. Seahawks

    6. Vikings/Eagles

     

    Pretty sure that’s accurate going into W17. Winner of Colts/Titans gets in, but if Texans lose that winner gets the division crown & Houston drops to wildcard. I believe the same applies to Chiefs/Chargers if the Chiefs lose and Chargers win.

     

    Eagles need to win & have the Vikings lose, so they’re less likely but you never know. I didn’t think they’d beat the Rams on the road and then the Texans in back-to-back games. Freakin Foles making magic happen once again.

  9. I love a good slugfest defensive battle kind of game, but I have to admit that the style that Chiefs and Rams play with has its own merit. Statistically their defenses are pretty terrible, but I think part of that could be that their offense can get off the field with a TD so quickly that it leaves the D out to dry. Despite the ridiculous yardage and scoring of that game, there were some pretty great defensive plays too. Aaron Donald had two friggin strip sacks, one that went for a TD. The offenses were just... better.

  10. 2 minutes ago, Clovdyx said:

    Couldn't disagree more.  One of the dumbest games I've ever seen.  Yeah, it's fun to see a couple big plays, but I want to say there were like 20 plays of 20+ yards.  There were more touchdowns in that game than the Bills had all season (at that point).  

     

    well the Bills suck so that's not a surprising stat.

  11. It wasn’t lol

     

    That Rams/Chiefs game was an anomaly imo. Maybe not unexpected for those two teams, but certainly not the norm across the League.

     

    either way, it was a fun game to watch once the flags stopped flying every play.

  12. I read something a while back that sprung back into my mind when I heard about this last night. It was just a simple screen shot from Tumblr or some other site that I saw on Facebook, or Pinterest, or somewhere.

     

    It talked about how one day, we'd be watching the newest Marvel movie, and when the credits rolled and the post-credits scene was finished, we'd sit there in the theatre and realize that something was missing. The movie was incomplete somehow, despite how well it may have entertained us. We'd realize that Stan Lee's cameo scene wasn't included because he'd finally passed.

     

    Sad day.

×
×
  • Create New...