Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY

WoT If…Moridin Was Turned?


Mashiara Sedai

Welcome back to "WoT If?", Dragonmount's weekly theory blog. Once again, I set out with the intention of examining the body-swap at the end of A Memory of Light.  Again, I got distracted by other things.  Sorry to get your hopes up, but I'm pushing body-swap back for the next edition.  Rather, I want to look at something else that deals with Moridin and his ties to the Shadow.  Before we start, though:

 

SPOILER WARNING.  This will include content from A Memory of Light.  Please DO NOT read this if you have not completed the book.

 

In Chapter 2, "A Dangerous Place," Pevara and Androl are preparing to con the Asha'man Dobser to get information on Logain's whereabouts.  As they are doing so, Pevara says, "The accounts seem to agree. The more dedicated a person was to the Light before being taken, the more dedicated they'll be to the Shadow after falling."

 

Several questions popped into my head when I read this the first time. 

 

1) How would they be able to gauge this? Is there some way to give a person's dedication to the Light a value? 

 

2) What accounts are there of this transition?  Would they have to follow around Black Sisters and witness their evil deeds to see how far they'd gone to the dark side? 

 

3) If they have this information, and know the Forsaken are loose (thirteen channelers), why wasn't there some Tower alert system warning of the possible danger?  Especially since three separate parties went to the Black Tower where there were channelers galore. 

 

So, let's look at each of these questions and see what we can learn.  First off, how to gauge this.  It seems to me like most people in Randland are indifferent to the Creator.  They claim to "walk in the Light," which means they try their hardest not to do bad things.  But the definition of "bad" isn't very well defined in Randland terms.  In the Two Rivers, they have a pretty strict upbringing where everything from boys who "did not keep out of their elders’ way," to polygamist relationships that would cause "the Women’s Circle [to swallow] their tongues" are considered "bad" (Path of Daggers, Chapter 22, "Gathering Clouds" and Winter's Heart, Chapter 12, "A Lily in Winter", respectively).  But do these constitute as the Shadow?  Most would agree they don't.

 

Then how would one gauge a person's devotion to the Light or to the Shadow?  There aren't any concrete definitions of what is of the Light and what of the Shadow.  We see several instances where characters do what they feel is right, despite the cost to them or others.  Galad does this regularly, as do Mat, Perrin, and Rand.  They feel they do the Light's work by sacrificing themselves for a greater good.  By Wheel of Time standards, I think they all are dedicated to the Light.  On the flip side, we see the Forsaken act out of greed and malice, hurting anyone and everyone they can get their hands on.  Naturally, they would be devoted to the Shadow. 

 

But if this trick of thirteen channelers and thirteen Myrddraal is so well known there are records of it in the White Tower, maybe it was common in the Age of Legends as well.  I'm getting ahead of myself, though.  On to point number two.

 

The records themselves baffle me.  As I said earlier, how would the Light side know all that the Shadow does in order to track how dedicated a person would be to the Shadow?  And since the definition of Light and Shadow vary by town, how could the White Tower specify which acts are which?  Was Toveine's part in the "vileness" after the Aiel War an act of the Light or the Shadow?  What we see of her as a Turned Aes Sedai seems pretty bad, so she must have been dedicated to the Light.  Yet her actions of gentling men before reaching the Tower were condemned and got her exiled, despite her belief that they had "been necessary and right" (Path of Daggers, Chapter 26, "The Extra Bit").  Because of this, there seems to be no way to accurately judge a person's intent.  These records probably couldn't prove anything one way or the other.

 

For number three, why wasn't the Tower put on high alert when they realized the Forsaken were free?  And doubly so when they found out Rand had started a school for male channelers.  Since most Aes Sedai foolishly doubt the existence of the Black Ajah, when other channelers come into the world, they should have had the sense to be afraid, yet they weren't.  Toveine leads fifty Aes Sedai to the Black Tower, knowing that thirteen of them could turn someone to the Shadow.  I can't believe there wasn't more caution in this endeavor.

 

Of course, there is the argument that this information is in the Thirteenth Depository, only known to Sitters, Heads of the Ajahs, the Keeper, and the Amyrlin.  But Pevara is a Sitter and apparently has access to the "accounts."  On top of that, they were ordered to bond Asha'man by Tsutama, the Head of the Red Ajah, who would also know of these records.  And Toveine was also a Sitter before her exile, so she would know this information too.  And Reds would be the first to think that male channelers were Shadowspawn—or at least Shadow sworn.  Yet no precaution was taken in either case.

 

All of this speculation leads me to two conclusions: Taim was not Turned; Moridin/Ishamael might have been.

 

Before, I always maintained that Taim had been turned by the 13x13 combo.  It seemed most likely because of Bashere's inability to recognize him right away in Lord of Chaos (Chapter 2, "A New Arrival").  However, Brandon Sanderson was asked this very question:

 

Question: Was Taim turned by a circle of thirteen?

 

Brandon Sanderson: RAFO. I will say that he was never a very nice guy.

 

If Taim was not very nice before, that means he lacked a dedication to the Light, which means his dedication to the Shadow would have been just as weak, if Turned.  We see by his elevation to one of the Chosen that Taim's dedication to the Shadow is strong.  From this logic, I don't think Taim was Turned.  I'm going to change my official stance on that.

 

But what about the other Forsaken?  We see time and time again that they are evil to their bones...except Moridin.  The other Forsaken have their own reasons for going to the Shadow, and they seem to do it willingly.  Yet we never get a convincing reason with Moridin, other than the fact that he wants the whole world to die.  In the comments for other blogs, we talked about Moridin having an epiphany similar to Rand's in "Veins of Gold" (The Gathering Storm, Chapter 50).  But, since Moridin didn't have the love Rand did, he was unable to find that last sliver of hope to keep fighting.  But I'll offer another reason.  What if Ishamael—or Elan Morin—was just as dedicated to the Light as Lews Therin, but was caught by servants of the Shadow and Turned?  I think this would explain better how Elan Morin could have flipped sides so easily and quickly.  He was so dedicated to the Light that he became just as dedicated to the Shadow.  That could be the reason he was trusted above all the others, because his own ambitions were eradicated by the Shadow's will.

 

That will be all for today's edition.  I'm going to have a break next week (for school work) and the week after (for JordanCon).  But we'll return on the 30th, and hopefully, I'll have time to talk with Brandon Sanderson and ask a few questions.  If anyone is going to JordanCon, make sure to say hi to me.  And, as always, thanks for reading!




User Feedback

Recommended Comments

I think that a turned Ishamael makes sense, and would explain how he

had the cojones to declare for the Shadow while standing in the Hall of Servants. However, the limit on knowledge of the 13x13 wasn't limited, unless the Mistress of Novices has access, because it is she who revealed that to

Egwene during her Testing. (It was Sheriam, wasn't it? I have no sources atm).

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was under the impression that Elan was the most "dangerous" Forsaken, and the most trusted, because he did not really do it for profit or gain.

He think he had concluded that as time pass, the number of times the Dark One try to break free reach infinity and thus the odds that one of the times the Dragon (or whoever is fighting) will fail also reach infinity. It was basicly just a matter of time until the Dark One won.

Why prolong the fighting, the suffering and the agony?

 

Checking this against the WoT-wiki I find this almost word for word: wot.wikia.com/wiki/Ishamael

"He was unique among the Forsaken as being the only member of the group who did not join for the promise of power or immortality (at least not per se), but because his logic concluded that the Dark One must inevitably win against the Dragon, and therefore the only path was to join him and rule for a time."

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think so. A turned person is easily recognizable looking him in the eyes. I know Rand would have noticed this if it was true.

Moridin isn't like the other Forsaken because he isn't evil as they are. I've had this conversation many times, and I still maintain that Ishamael is not a bad person in his core. He is a victim of sheer logic. It's mentioned more than once through the series that he turned to the shadow because his philosofy and logic (that the Wheel would turn endlessly and the Last Battle would happen once and once again until the DO wins and breaks the Wheel, ending time) led him to an unquestionable resolution: that the Shadow would eventually win, sooner or later. Once under the Shadow he gets entangled like everyone else, but he doesn't fight for evil, he fights for inevitability.

 

As for the Aes Sedai going to the Black Tower, I don't think there's a single passage on the book that sais AS consider men channelers as Shadow. They persecution of the male channelers is fueled only by the fear of madness. They were reckless in going there thinking it all would be so easy, but they didn't have reason to believe the BT was Shadow-controled.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think one way to answer your first two questions is to look at the Shadowspawn. We learn in MoL that the trollocs and Myrdrall used to be men and the dark hounds used to be wolves. Trollocs and Myrdrall were apparently created by experiments (I forget by whom - don't have the book in front of me) and we can surmise that the dark hounds were created the same way. The dark hounds appear to be the strongest and hardest to kill of the creatures and we know that wolves are on the extreme "anti-shadow" side of the coin. There is also the Red Veils. It's a pretty good assumption that the majority of Aiel men who could channel chose (passionately) to go fight the Dark One (though there are some among them that were truly evil). From the little we saw of them, they were all strongly dedicated to the Shadow.

It makes sense that these behaviors would be easily observed by the Sisters (and anyone else who cared about such things) over the centuries.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's pretty well clarified by the end of AMoL that the process of "turning to the shadow" is actually removing the influence of the creator from the person (similar to how in Rand's 'perfect' world he removed the influence of the dark one). Without that influence, all of the person's other attributes are still the same, they just no longer have any desire to be or do good.

 

The reason that people who were strong *for* the light are then strong against it is because those were the people with real strength of character, determination, etc. After being "turned" all of that still remains, just lacking the impetus to strive for the light.

 

Basically we have a statement that says "Those who were strongest for the light became the strongest for the dark after being turned".  That A implies B does not always mean that the inverse of A implies the inverse of B; thus, it's not necessarily valid to say that "Those who were not strong for the light would not be strong for the dark".

 

I don't think Moriden was ever Turned; I think he did it of his own choice.  It is pretty clear that those who had to be Turned generally are less effective.  In the world RJ created you have to have some influence both ways to be complete; that's why the dark one couldn't be destroyed.  I think that the ones forcibly Turned were less capable because they lacked that impetus to the light just like the ones in Rand's 'perfect' world were not themselves without any impetus toward evil.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think even your opening paragraph is a spoiler. if i hadn't read amol yet, i would be sooooo pissed off. it is the first thing that caught my eye when i came onto this site.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

.., he fights for inevitability. 

Why do you resist, Mr. Anderson?

Haha that was so good.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the 'rating' issue doesn't bother me. We all know lots of people, and some we regard more highly than others, whether it be for their honesty, charity, integrity, etc. If everyone we knew got turned, it would be obviously apparent that the people we held in the highest regards were now the worst of the lot. I don't think you have to quantify it. If the most honest person became a congenital liar, and the most compassionate became a sadist, while on the other hand the guy that cheats a little on his taxes just starts stealing from his employer, the pattern would be pretty clear.

 

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, it's been a while since I spouted a theory, but I'll just throw it out there. I'll assume that history doesn't repeat itself exactly, ie. that last Third Age the Dragon Reborn was really Rand Al'Thor. If differences are possible, perhaps Ishamael was a Dragon that failed in his epiphany. (However that'll work out with there still being a world I haven't quite figured out yet.) Possible "proofs": All the above, plus his seeming obsession with TP; He has become darkness himself. He thought himself the DO, and Rand (possibly) associates himself with the Creator. One more point: at the end of ToM, the Dark prophecy references the Lord of the Evening. Perhaps Ishamael, as a mirror to Rand? Just thinking

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont have the books in front of me, but one of Graendal's POV's kind of discounts this theory I think. While explaining to Moridin how Rand's destruction of her palace by balefire would pain him, she comments in her head that Moridin was similarly pained as he slowly killed his conscience in service to the DO (whereas others such as Semi were already corrupt). It seemed to me that Moridin, the logic guy, thought it through and came to the conclusion that the DO was where to throw his allegiance...and then began a lengthy process of becoming more and more comfortable with the shadow. To me, that is what makes the character so original and so powerful. For him to be turned would be to ruin him.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Elysium about that point and there is also a hint from Lanfear (whatever her new name is) that shows Moridin was not likely turned.  It's in her conversation with Perrin in AMOL when they are discussing the red-veiled Aiel.  She mentions that she never was into the whole 13x13 turning trick because it takes away your creativity and drive, you're left sort of an automaton--still having some same characteristics you had from before but seemingly decreased in elan vital.  (speaking of elan vital, I wonder if Mori's name "Elan Morin" might mean something like "energy of death" or something like that...)

   Anyway, my point is that if she was on a rant on this subject as she seemed to be, and seeing that she is a vindictive and spiteful person, then if there were a Forsaken who had been "turned" she likely would have made a snide comment about them at that point in the converstation.  It may seem like a small amount of data to go on, but I really think that with what we've seen of Lanfear she can be counted on to make detractive statements about people when she's ranting, as she did so many times about LT and others.

    That being said though, I did find this a very entertaining and thought provoking article and worth looking at.  It wasn't until you got me thinking here that I spotted this particular fact.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites



Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...