Honeymoon

[reyler]

Oh, grow a spine. Or I could loan one out to you, I've a few spares I've collected.

[mmeeshal]

Yeah, well, you don't have mine.

 

It's still here, see?

[reyler]

I own your butt, though.

[mmeeshal]

Is that why there's a birthmark that says "reyrey?"

[reyler]

That's actually a USDA stamp.

[mmeeshal]

No, that's not awkward or embarrassing.

[FallingBullets]

mine has a barcode

 

its registerd as a whoopie cushion :P

[bad company]

Is that why there's a birthmark that says "reyrey?"

Hazzah!! ;D

[mmeeshal]

That would make me feel like reyler and I...were meant to be, y'know? :P

[FallingBullets]

I think you are....in some weird way

[reyler]

Thought you didn't like girls.

[LedZepMan]

It's in duscussion as we speak

[mmeeshal]

::)

I don't like girls THAT way.

 

But meant to be, as in...we're supposed to be TOGETHER.  Yeah.  Not together-together.  Just together. *snuggles reyler up*

 

It's a complicated partnership.  I think we're like Frankenstein and Igor.  Only more troubled.

 

MUWAHAHAHA

[reyler]

Plus Igor was made up for the movie. That book sucked, though, so, you know, more power to them.

[mmeeshal]

I liked the book. *pouts*

[reyler]

you have a high tolerance for boring, then.

[mmeeshal]

No I have a love for learning and intellectual growth.

[reyler]

That book is so dry that if you didn't already know the premise is "he makes a monster and brings it to life", you wouldn't even realize such had happened until three chapters after the fact. There were like five good sentences and the rest is oh my god how can frigging Frankenstein be so boring

[mmeeshal]

I actually got emotionally involved in it.  Getting mad at Frankenstein for being so stupid and insensitive; feeling bad for his monster.

 

I wouldn't read it for fun, but in a classroom setting where we discussed our thoughts on the book and wrote essays on our interpretations of themes in the novel, it was quite a good read.

[reyler]

Yes, well, I don't read books to do critical analyses of them, I read books to enjoy them. I don't look for deeper meanings.

[mmeeshal]

I usually don't either.

 

I was in AP English.  I didn't have a choice in the matter.

 

But I find that reading classics like that, for the purpose of finding deeper meanings, is good, every once in a while.

[reyler]

Man, my high school sucked. Senior English we only read three things: Macbeth, 1984, and Pride and Prejudice. Macbeth I already knew, and I learned never to go anywhere near Orwell again.

[mmeeshal]

We read Frankenstein, Oedipus Rex, The Sound and the Fury, part of Bartleby, and we had a poetry section.

 

I think that's all we did...

[reyler]

Pride and Prejudice I actually liked, though high school being now eight years in the past, I don't remember what I liked about it. Also my English teacher gave me personally a recommendation for The Fountainhead, which I liked, even if Ayn Rand didn't seem to really think through all of her ideas too well.

[mmeeshal]

Ooo, I read Pride & Prejudice for fun, and I loved it.  I tried to read Emma, but I couldn't get past the first few pages, though the movie was good.  I read Jane Eyre and loved that too.

 

My Creative Writing class's student teacher recommended the Wheel of Time to me. :D