I had responded to this post earlier but got a Bad Gateway request! I think it's a very fair post, however I'm not sure that they did not want to follow the books more, I think given the choice any fan of the books (which Rafe is) would want to ensure as much faithfulness to the source material as would be possible. But to answer your final point on the reasoning, much of Rafe's comments around creating the adaptation has focussed on telling the story of WoT in it's entirety. Even his post addressing the cancellation of the show mentions this - "One of my core goals in making this show, even from the earliest crafting of the pitch, has been to tell the whole story". I think they took the view in adapting the books that they needed to lay groundwork for the epic conclusion of WoT very early on. That meant showing us a lot more Aes Sedai politicking for example than we got in the books, or at least showing it "on screen". We see a lot more of the internal Aes Sedai divisions, and establishing how the White Tower would come to try and cage the Dragon for example, setting up Dumai's Wells in future. The Stepin episode was clearly to set up what happens to a Warder when their Aes Sedai dies - potentially establishing the danger for Rand further down the road. I think this driving factor really was behind the vast majority of adaptation choices, in that they were trying to make sure that the ending would really "land" so to speak. However, I think they may have gotten a bit lost in that big picture thinking and didn't spend as much time establishing the characters which drive the entire story. I said in the show cancellation thread that I think the big picture focus is good generally, they have to get across so much in the world of WoT in a limited time, so spreading the love is a good idea. And I liked things like the Stepin episode as a bottle episode almost, to show TV audiences how the Warder bond functions. However, given the choice to establish the EF5 more versus what was a very good episode on it's own, I would choose the former, especially early in the show. As it was, while the show improved and S3 was the best so far, I still think it suffered from not developing our main characters. I think very often they spread their focus too thinly and it was no coincidence in my view that the highest highs of the show was when they spent time on one character or story - Rhuidean, Nynaeve's Accepted Test, Egwene with the collar. Funnily enough, considering the issues they had with the casting, one of the best developed characters for me was Mat, as I felt it was clear what they were doing with his arc of being a reluctant hero. Just like the other characters though, I wish we had more time with him.

I think there is some unfair commentary and comparisons in here. Andor sits within an incredibly well established universe. Anyone with a passing interest in movies understands Star Wars and the general feel of that universe. There is very little world-building that needs to be done for a show like Andor. However it is very clear to me that Andor had more talented writers than WoT - or, at least, Tony Gilroy had more absolute control over the story of Andor than Rafe did over WoT. Disney obviously trusted Gilroy to tell the story in whatever way he saw fit, even though they shortened the seasons available to him from 5 to 2. I am not sure that Rafe had as much leeway from Prime studios, considering the stories around studio notes received on a single episode etc. There is a consistency in story-telling in Andor, and a depth to the writing, that is rarely present in WoT. I am not absolving Rafe and the creators from all blame here. But - and I may be repeating myself from discussions going all the way back to Season 1 - I really really dislike seeing commentary around WoT that describes the motivations behind creating the show as "they wanted to tell their own story" "they don't like the source material", "they had an agenda" "they hated the fans" and that general tone. We can debate all day long about how the adaptation worked and didn't work, but I really don't understand seeing interviews with Rafe in particular and thinking "this man hates Robert Jordan's books". It's clear to me he loves the story and world of WoT, and tried to adapt it as best he could with his own creative ideas on how to do so. That doesn't make him someone with sinister, selfish motivations. It just makes him an artist who loves WoT, maybe not in the exact same way that I love WoT, but that's fine, that's what art is all about really.

The series made me think a lot about the source material actually, more than I had in years. I am planning a re-read when winter comes and the weather turns. I remember a really good discussion with another poster about Veins of Gold, prompted by Tam’s explanation of the Wheel in episode 1. I was quite excited by that explanation and how it could pull Rand back for Veins of Gold, whereas the other poster felt it might simplify that later scene if they just rely on Rand’s relationship with Tam. I appreciated it and it gave me a new perspective on VoG. I also came to appreciate other characters like Perrin a bit deeper - it may seem silly to some but I never really thought too deeply about his Wolfbrother “violence” as a contrast to the Tuatha’an. I always felt his inner conflict was the axe - what he had to do in his new life as ta’veren and leader, versus the hammer - the simpler life he yearned for before Winternight. Violence was a part of this struggle of course but I never thought too much about the Tinkers as a contrast until the show came out and discussing it here. I also enjoyed thinking about the adaptation choices, and it was cool to see what people felt was absolutely core to the story against my own thoughts on it.

lots of discussion here but for what it's worth I re-watched S1 & S2 recently, while waiting for new episodes to drop for S3, and I was surprised by how much I still enjoyed S1 (up to episode 6). Yes there are changes and the opening to the show was really bad, I hated the Dragon "mystery" and the Leavetaking scene was terribly done as well - but I found myself still enjoying the majority of episodes once they got "on the road" so to speak. S2 was much more disappointing overall to me, apart from one or two excellent scenes and episodes.

It’s an incredibly frustrating platform to use as well. I’m a big fan of Invincible but had no idea there was a new series out until months after it had aired. Without a doubt the worst streaming service for me

I think the focus on the “Dragon could be a woman” thing is a bit misguided - the issue in S1 was that the Dragon was a mystery - because they did not execute the mystery plot well and in doing so all the characters suffered in S1. My frustration generally with the show has been a lack of depth and very inconsistent writing. I remember Rafe commenting about the Dragon being a woman line, saying that they felt for the show they could introduce the idea that the prophecies are not so certain, that Aes Sedai knowledge was not so reliable. I thought this was a great idea with potential in television, with Black Ajah shenanigans and Verin especially becoming a key character with her Brown knowledge and true identity. But it was a comment in an interview, and nothing within the show really felt like this was something being truly explored, at least to me. When you look at the writing in Andor, and how for example the Ghorman plot in S2. Without spoilers but I was more invested in this Star Wars planet and their culture and story in 6 episodes than really anything the WoT show achieved in 3 seasons. Rhuidean was the closest really. WoT always felt spread too thin in each series, and it’s no coincidence in my opinion that the strongest scenes and episodes are those that focus in on particular characters or arcs. Again, sad to see it cancelled. Josha became Rand to me, and I love Zoe as Nynaeve as well.

I’m happy for you that you’re so energised to go on and on about it, but I don’t have the energy to repeat what I’ve said on these pages since S1. so if you’re interested go through my post history but otherwise let’s leave our interactions on this point there

Pretty disappointing to see tired old arguments about woke-ism and Rafe’s sinister motivations in here. You can just dislike the show without descending into petty point scoring or revelling in the show being cancelled. I thought they had definitely found their footing and had really begun to focus properly on Rand’s story in S3. There are lessons in these 3 seasons for people looking at adaptations. Choices were made to sustain a vasts world across at least 8 seasons (per Rafe’s quotes about the absolutely minimum time needed to tell the story). However in hindsight, I think you would move things around a bit. Keep the world and story focussed and tight in S1, and expand things out bit by bit. I think they should have focussed on the EF5 almost exclusively in S1 with Moiraine’s leadership, and bring in the Tower politics and Warder bonds in S2. Abandon the Dragon “mystery” and let the EF5 breathe and develop on their own. The EF5 too often felt sidelined to me in that first season. I think it’s right to spread the focus, but maybe they did it too soon? On the flipside of this, I rewatched S1 recently and in my view it actually holds up quite well until they go to the Blight and the COVID impacted episodes occur. Even then, Rand and Ishy at the Eye, with the possible futures, was the best part of the finale. But I just felt the show was hampered by some of its own decisions really. I’m sad it’s cancelled. I think they casting wad excellent and I suppose we’ll always have Rhuidean

I don't really have anything to add around the discussion of Rand's dreams / Lanfear / Egwene, but I want to say that reading through the last few pages has made me rethink that whole triangle in the show which I'm on record as saying I really really disliked. I still don't like it and wish the show spent more time on other areas, but it's been interesting to read through the discussion and seeing those scenes in a different light.