[s]Goal: 100,000 New Goal: 200,000[/s] New Goal: 250.000

[mmeeshal]

[Naked~Frog]

INTRODUCTION

 

The object of this post is to bring together a definitive document to cover the phenomena of the Usenet Troll. To many a troll is nothing more than an annoying method of defeating the killfile whereas to the heavily killfiled, trolling can be a virtual Godsend.

 

What I want this document to focus on is how to create entertaining trolls. I have drawn on the expertise of the writer's of some of Usenet's finest and best remembered trolls. Trolls are for fun. The object of recreational trolling is to sit back and laugh at all those gullible idiots that will believe *anything*.

[mmeeshal]

[mmeeshal]

[Naked~Frog]

Section 1: What Is A Troll?

 

The WWW gives this as a definition:

 

troll v.,n. To utter a posting on Usenet designed to attract predictable responses or flames. Derives from the phrase "trolling for newbies"; which in turn comes from mainstream "trolling";, a style of fishing in which one trails bait through a likely spot hoping for a bite.

[Naked~Frog]

The well-constructed troll is a post that induces lots of newbies and flamers to make themselves look even more clueless than they already do, while subtly conveying to the more savvy and experienced that it is in fact a deliberate troll.

[mmeeshal]

[Naked~Frog]

If you don't fall for the joke, you get to be in on it.

 

The following extract is from a broader expansion of the defining comments given above:

 

In Usenet usage, a troll is not a grumpy monster that lives beneath a bridge accosting passers-by, but rather a provocative posting to a newsgroup intended to produce a large volume of frivolous responses.

[mmeeshal]

[Naked~Frog]

The content of a "troll posting generally falls into several areas. It may consist of an apparently foolish contradiction of common knowledge, a deliberately offensive insult to the readers of a newsgroup, or a broad request for trivial follow-up postings.

 

There are three reasons why people troll newsgroups:

 

People post such messages to get attention, to disrupt newsgroups, and simply to make trouble.

 

Career trollers tend for the latter two whilst the former is the mark of the clueless newbie and should be ignored.

[mmeeshal]

[Naked~Frog]

Section 2: Design Issues

 

A troll is no different to any other Usenet posting. That needs to be stressed.

 

Any article that you decide to write should be written with a view to it actually being read by large numbers of people. Simply X-posting to large numbers of irrelevant newsgroups is not creative trolling - it is just spam and should be avoided.

 

The experienced troller spends time carefully choosing the right subject and delivering it to the right newsgroup. With trolls, delivery is just as important as the subject.

[mmeeshal]

[Naked~Frog]

Start the troll in a reasonable and erudite manner. You have to engage your readers' interest and draw them in.

 

Never give too much away at the start - although a brief abstract with hints of what's to come can work wonders.

 

Construct your troll in a manner to make it readable. Use short paragraphs and lots of white space. Keep line length below eighty characters. Use a liberal amount of emphasis and even the occasional illustration.

 

A good rule of thumb is that as your troll becomes more and more ludicrous put extra effort into the presentation - this keeps the mug punter confused. Let confusion and chaos be your goal

[mmeeshal]

[mmeeshal]

[mmeeshal]

[Naked~Frog]

Section 3: Content

Make your subject a relevant one. Posting "Star Trek Sucks" into hk.forsale is not going to work very well and is liable to utterly destroy your hard earned reputation as a troller overnight.

 

You do not have to make the subject clear. Trolls are aimed at two audiences, the respondees and the lurkers.

[mmeeshal]

[Naked~Frog]

The best trolls reveal their true subject only to the lurkers. In every sense those who reply to your troll are your tools. So choose a theme for your troll and stick to it.

 

Outwardly you need to appear sincere, but at the same time you have to tell your *real* audience that this is blatant flamebait. Your skill is shown in the easy way that you manipulate large areas of the Usenet community into making public fools of themselves.

[mmeeshal]

[mmeeshal]

[Naked~Frog]

Section 4: Newsgroup Selection

 

Choice of newsgroup is as important as the subject, tone and structure of the troll. You want to appeal to each group you X-post into to ensure responses from each group.

 

A well delivered troll will anticipate what those responses will be and thus ensure that contradictions will arise amongst the different groups that you are setting up.

[mmeeshal]

[Naked~Frog]

BAD:

Posting "USA Sucks" to alt.nuke.the.USA, alt.usa-sucks, aus.flame.usa

This is totally on-topic and obvious. A truly useless troll.