Yes, but there it is....One is a classic that has lasted decades the other is a semi controversial series that finished midrun.
Both contained things espousing certain values over others yet one balanced things out to become a generational classic that will likely manage a century whilst the other was imbalanced and will be largely forgotten in a year or two.
He-Man is another example, the early 80s version is considered classic despite its blatant inserted lecturing message of the day moral lesson, the 2020s later revival with over inserted woke agenda largely that tried a similar thing, which pretty much ended the branding.
Doctor Who is the same....
There is a balance and if you put too much of something in it, you put enough people off that it can't sustain itself and it will wither and die.
That is what happened here, frankly much of this could have been avoided by creating a new show rather than relying on WoT branding, I don't understand the thinking of paying hundreds of millions to use an IP only to then change it so much.
Much of the decision making that must have gone on makes no sense, the level of hubris must have been huge.
The show renewals before audience reception for instance.
Things just don't make sense, its not like the showrunners, directors and producers had any great passion about the books, even exploitation of the brand managed only short term gains as many were off put by the interpretation.
The whole thing reeks of boardroom committee wanting too many things put in and taken out.