OK not going to post much about the battles but I will say they were written and planned really badly, too often the same action is repeated and the plans of the battle are well rubbish, for example take the zombie village attacking the dam. so we have a force that will live again after they die, why use them on the dam, when they could have been used elsewhere.

you have a guy sitting there opening gateways why not to by pass the dam and tie off the weave and then take the zombie village to the heart of the enemy.

the whole battle turned on Lan, not Matt not a plan but in Lan.  the last battle kind of sucked and from the many posts I have read others have also thought the same as me, why the hell can't you just get on with it, oh I remember you need to pad the books out to rip off the readers   

She's Tom Bombadill for the WoT.

hell no,Tom had a reason in LOTR, not some lame arse plot point

I think people make too big a deal about Nakomi.  There are always going to be questions and theories about a book when it's finished.  We don't even know for sure it was Nakomi at the end when Rand carried Moridin from the Pit of Doom.

 

 

 

 

 

It doesn't take anything away from the story to have her thrown in there.  Either way, I thoroughly enjoyed the book.  It was an emotional rollercoaster for me and the best book I've read in a long time.  I'm not satisfied with the ending, but at the same time, I will admit I never wanted it all to end anyway.

 I disagree, having Nakomi

does take away from the book(s) as do many other things that happened in the

last few.  When you spend so long reading

the series you understand that there are some rules to the universe that’s

created by the author.  Yes they can bend

the rules but to pull things out of the air is just a lie to the reader.