Jump to content

DRAGONMOUNT

A WHEEL OF TIME COMMUNITY
Nolder

The Wall & Immigration Enforcement

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Nolder said:

 

 

I'm sorry for getting mad I realize this is getting heated but I'm going to ask you Lenlo take a step back and really think about it. Do you think the number really matters? There should be no Mexican heroine coming over our border. No human trafficking and raped girls. No murderers escaping justice from their home country. None of this is ok or acceptable. Do you really want to debate the God damn numbers? Is calling Trump a liar so important to you that this is the hill you'd choose to make that happen? This hill is corpses and human misery. Think about it.

 

If numbers don't matter to you, and 1,000,000 is the same as 10,000 then 1 is the same as 10,000; and if you think that building a phsyical barrier will bring human trafficing, migration, drug trafficing or drug overdoses to 0 then you're insane. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Tyzack said:

 

No.

 

He'll declare a national emergency and redirect DoD funds.

He'll claim victory, and I guess sign the CR?

 

He'll be able to claim a victory and blame the lack on construction on liberal judges, or whatever.

*shrug*

 

He's the worst.

Well, he came out today supposedly and said he will not be/does not want to be declaring a state of national emergency.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/house-prepares-to-break-for-weekend-all-but-ensuring-longest-shutdown-in-us-history/2019/01/11/7f6e88c8-15bb-11e9-b6ad-9cfd62dbb0a8_story.html?utm_term=.3b1b2b255eee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Tyzack said:

 

If numbers don't matter to you, and 1,000,000 is the same as 10,000 then 1 is the same as 10,000; and if you think that building a phsyical barrier will bring human trafficing, migration, drug trafficing or drug overdoses to 0 then you're insane. 

The numbers don't matter if you admit there's a problem.

Do you need to be convinced there's a problem?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Nolder said:

The numbers don't matter if you admit there's a problem.

Do you need to be convinced there's a problem?

 

Dodge.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Lenlo said:

 

So...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Tyzack said:

 

So...

So your assumption that he will go around the system and use DoD funds is, at least for the moment, wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Lenlo said:

So your assumption that he will go around the system and use DoD funds is, at least for the moment, wrong.

 

Right...

The so was in reference to what comes next. The complete sentence would have been:

 

So....what comes next/now?

Edited by Tyzack

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Tyzack said:

 

Right...

The so was in reference to what comes next. The complete sentence would have been:

 

So....what comes next/now?

Im sorry for not auto-completing your sentence and assuming what you want to say?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Tyzack said:

 

Dodge.

 

 

As in I'm dodging or you're dodging?

 

2 hours ago, Tyzack said:

 

So...

He won't let it go forever.

my guess is it Dems don't deal by end of Jan he will try the other route.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Lenlo said:

Im sorry for not auto-completing your sentence and assuming what you want to say?

 

Fair point, my bad

 

Edited by Tyzack

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Nolder said:

As in I'm dodging or you're dodging?

 

He won't let it go forever.

my guess is it Dems don't deal by end of Jan he will try the other route.

 

Such as? I see no other way for him to end and claim “victory”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Tyzack said:

 

Such as? I see no other way for him to end and claim “victory”

I guess that answers the first question.

 

Anyway, the national emergency route where he doesn't need congress. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Nolder said:

I guess that answers the first question.

 

Anyway, the national emergency route where he doesn't need congress. 

 

But he said he won’t, so unless he back down, how do you see this ending?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Tyzack said:

 

But he said he won’t, so unless he back down, how do you see this ending?

Trump, Jr. has already floated the idea of funding the Wall in Exchange for making the Obama Dreamer policy into law. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Tyzack said:

 

But he said he won’t, so unless he back down, how do you see this ending?

I haven't been paying too much attention, are you sure he said he wont?

I thought he said he didn't want to which obviously wouldn't be the same thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Posts

    • I think the sharans were a victim of RJ spending too much time on stuff that went nowhere, like Luca or took too long to wrap, faile's rescue. Don't get me wrong, I listened to the whole story cover to cover so to speak because story as a whole made up for the less than stellar parts. In this regard I think Brandon gets unfairly blamed by some when he had no control over the first 11 books. E.g. the Sharans should've been introduced in FOH or something and not as a Deus Ex Machina bad guy army.
    • "I'm sure a lot of this equipment can be downgraded, and added body-cams with minimal cost."   Well dash board cams or such might be doable but what do you mean by "Downdgrading the equipment?       "From an Evidentiary stand point, maybe court cases will become expedited through the use of body-cams, without necessitating every cop involved come in and testify."   Never going to happen. First, the cop is required to testify as to chain of possession of the video. Second the video itself is never enough evidence. both the prosecutor and the defense will want to question the officer as to why things occured as they are pictured on the video, about things that occured but were not picked up on the video and to explain whether his actions depicted on the video were within his understanding of departmental policy and the requirements of the law.     "Hell, adding new/better software, could help Cops write their reports in a fraction of the time... Which could help those who are barely literate. "   Likely not a good idea. You want the reports based on the officers recollection and notes. The videos are helpful to determine discrepencies in the officer's reports in cases where such become an issue. By allowing the officer to veiw the video and then right his report you likely would be permitting officers to talyor the reports to explain away many issues that the videos might bring into focus.     
    • Rather quietly, with a niece and nephew each from different sibs. 
×